Notes on “Queer Temporality and Postmodern Geographies” by Judith Halberstam

Philo- Lit


 “Queer Temporality and Postmodern Geographies” by Judith Halberstam (Now known as Jack Halberstam)

 

It is the first chapter of the book ‘Queer Time and Place’

Introduces the concept ‘Queer Time’ and ‘Queer Space’

Concept of Queer time came out in and around 20th century- when gay communities were affected by AIDS epidemic

The author mentions two examples:

1.      Mark Doty’s poem about his lover’s death- “I have been living with a constantly diminishing future”

The concept ‘diminishing future’- author highlights- this says about the importance of present/ here 

2.      Thomas Gunn‘s “The time of the Pague’: He talks on compressed time and impending morality

Queer time- it is compressed as well as completely annihilated. Not only that queer time is completely a life where everything is unscripted.

In literatures also, these kind of new temporalities have emerged only along with AIDS epidemic- example Michael Cunningham’s  The Hours.

 

The Hours

A rewriting of Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway. (life of Clarissa Dalloway in a day)

In this work, Clarissa had attraction towards a female friend in her youth, but later marries a suitable man.

Clarissa also helps her friend Richard who is isolated by the society as he is suffering from AIDS.

Later Richard suicides (jumps out of the window)

(Mrs. Dalloway does not have queer characters and AIDS epidemic)

By rewriting the novel in this way, Cunningam has given a queer dimension to it. Queer time is attached to the plot.

Tries to show that queer time is very short. (Here ends in marriage or death)

 

Similarly

Another example is Cathy Cohen’s Boundaries of Blackness.

This book explains how short is the lifespan of people of color (black people) and poor people- especially people who are marginalised, drug users etc.

 

 

Introduction of these queer time and space- if we assess this we can see the difference that happened in twentieth century (political and cultural change)

The author says the normal time or normativity in time is associated with the middle class logic of marriage and reproduction- In a heterosexual woman’s life, there is a time for marriage, reproducing child, etc. which is established by the society. There is a biological clock for a female. Also there is a family time (time that must be devoted to look after children). There is a proper time for everything for a heterosexual family- a proper time for generational inheritance as well.

Therefore, automatically, queer time is non normative

·       Queer refers to non-normative logics and organisations of community, non-normative sexual identity and activity.

·       Queer time is any time reference when one leaves the normal time as explained by the bourgeoisie production of time.

·       Queer space refers to the place-making practices in which queer people engage / new understanding of space enabled by queer counter publics

Postmodernism was a period of crisis where one could rethink the practice of cultural production

In The Condition of Postmodernity, David Harvey has already said that whatever ides of time and space we have, they all are constructions of society. Time, Harvey explains, is organized according to the logic of capital accumulation, but those who benefit from capitalism in particular experience this logic as inevitable, and they are therefore able to ignore, repress, or erase the demands made on them and others by an unjust system. And to all these constructed time like ‘family time’, industrial time’ etc, we associate some values. And therefore we feel guilty of leisure time etc. This is in our consciousness.

Samuel Beckett's famous play Waiting for Godot can be read, for example, as a de familiarization of time spent- A treatise on the feeling of time wasted, of inertia or time outside of capitalist propulsion. Waiting, in this play, seems to be a form of postponement until it becomes clear that nothing has been postponed and nothing will be resumed.

 

The meaning of space, Harvey asserts, undergoes a double process of naturalization- first, it is naturalized in relation to use values (we presume that our use of space is the only and inevitable use of space-private property, for example)-but second, we naturalize space by subordinating it to time. The construction of spatial practices, in other words, is obscured by the naturalization of both time and space. But he does not explain clearly how time and space are naturalised.

 

The author says we need a more systematic understanding of space and time. For example, if we analyse the feminist historians’ arguments on space , we have a clear idea as to how in Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries, space in divided between genders.(domestic space- female more & public space- male). Racial theories have also included spatial dimensions. For example, Barrett in his work Blackness and Value: Seeing Double restores the original foundations of Western thought that were used to designate black as inhuman and white as human, black in association with idleness, perverse sexuality, and lack of self-consciousness, and white in association with diligence, legibility, the normal, the domestic, restraint, and

self-awareness.

 

Many theorists have criticised Harvey. Harvey's analysis, according to Anna Tsing (anthropologist and critic), suffers first from a simplistic mode of taking cultural shifts and then mapping them onto economic shifts; second, she claims that Harvey makes all of his assumptions about globalization without using an ethnographic research base. Finally, he overgeneralizes the "postmodern condition" on the basis of a flawed understanding of the role of culture, and then allows culture to stand in for all kinds of other evidence of the effects of globalization.

 

Anyhow theorists such as Fredrich Jameson, David Harvey and Edward William Soja have contributed much to the idea that postmodernism is completely a gendered and racialised space.

 

Soja is of the opinion that it was Foucault’s idea of heterotopia (concept that certain areas are considered as other or disturbing- eg: cemetery,etc)

 

By keeping in mind what Soja said and Harvey said, one can conclude that there are certain set of people who are outside the normal space- sex workers, club kids, HIV-positive barebackers, rent boys, homeless people, drug dealers, and the unemployed. Perhaps such people could productively be called "queer subjects" in terms of the ways they live (deliberately, accidentally, or of necessity) during the hours when others sleep and in the spaces (physical, metaphysical, and economic) that others have abandoned, and in terms of the ways they might work in the domains that other people assign to privacy and family. These peple cannot change this time as well- if they did, their life is at risk.

 

Postmodern geography, indeed, has built on Foucault's speculative but powerful essay on heterotopia and on Foucault's claim in this essay that "the present epoch will be above all an epoch of space" (Foucault 1986, 22). Based on this insight, Soja and Harvey argue that critical theory has privileged time/history over space/geography with many different implications. But for both Harvey in The Condition of Postmodemity and Jameson in "The Cultural Logic of Postmodernism," postmodernism is a strange and even bewildering confusion of time and space where history has lost its (materialist) meaning, time has become a perpetual present, and space has flattened out in the face of creeping globalization

 

Another thing about Harvey is that he always says that it is inevitable to avoid capitalism. He just explains the situation but does nothing or says nothing to change it or solve it.

One theorist who has accounted for the possibility of "the end of capitalism" isJ. K. Gibson-Graham, a term for two theorists Julie Graham and Katherine Gibson. Drawing on feminist studies and queer theory, Gibson-Graham contends that capitalism has been unnecessarily stabilized within Marxist representations as a totalizing force and a unitary entity. If we destabilize the meaning of capitalism using poststructuralist critiques of identity and signification, then we can begin to see the multiplicity of noncapitalist forms that constitute, supplement, and abridge global capitalism, but we can also begin to imagine, by beginning to see, the alternatives to capitalism that already exist and are presently under construction.

 

 

Even in case of heterosexuality and space, usually only the white gay men’s stories are discussed. One of the best studies of sexual space that does still focus on gay men, but recognizes the fault lines of class, race, and gender in the construction of sexual communities is Samuel R. Delany’s Times Square Red, Times Square Blue. The book is a kind of travelogue where he writes down his personal experiences, write about gay relationship cutting across different classes, races etc. He mentions about the experiences in Porn shops, triple—X theatres as well. These places can be called as ‘geographies of resistance’ as they are having a complete different space and time. He also says why a town face lift has been made in the small town city in Newyork where he visited- to eradicate the non normative spaces.

In order to create and maintain new spaces for interclass contact, Delany asserts that we need to be able,

·       first, to imagine such spaces; we have to find out where they are, and how they can be sustained and supported.

·       Second, we need to theorize the new spaces. It is not enough simply to point to new sites for interclass contact but as Delany has done here, we have to create a complex discourse around them through narrative and the meticulous work of archiving.

·       Third, we have to avoid nostalgia for what was and what has disappeared while creating a new formulation for future spaces and architectures.

Finally, Delany urges us to narrate an account of the invisible institutions that prop up counterpublics, but also to tell the story of the new technologies that want to eradicate them through a moral campaign about cleaning up the city.

 

The author says, even in Delany’s work, women are absent. He takes about different class, race in gay relationship but women are absent.

 

The division between urban and rural or urban and small town has had a major impact on the ways in which queer community has been formed and perceived in the United States. Until recently, small towns were considered hostile to queers and urban areas were cast as the queer's natural environment.

 

____________________________________________________________

 

 Next, the author explains how the book is divided

·       The first half of the book considers the sudden visibility of the transgender body in the late twentieth century against the backdrop of changing conceptions of time and space.

·       The book starts with the murder of a transgender (Brandon Teena, a young transgender man who was murdered in small-town Nebraska)

·       Chapters 2 and 3 explore the case of Brandon Teena in detail, and I return to the questions raised there about space, place, and identity later in my reading of Kimberly Peirce's feature film made about Brandon in 1999- Boys Don't cry

·       Chapter 4 on queer film and the transgender look, chapter 5 on queer visual culture and figurations of ambiguous embodiment, and to a certain extent, chapter 6 on mainstream appropriations of gender ambiguity all examine the circuits of influence that allow for the emergence of the transgender body as simultaneously a symbol for postmodern flexibility and a legible form of embodied subjectivity.

·       Chapter 7 builds on the set of questions the author asked in the Austin Powers chapter about influence, the circulation of cultural texts, male parody, and subcultural intensity, and the questions in chapter 5 about the avant-garde's appropriation of subcultural material, and explores dyke subcultures as one site for the development of queer counterpublics and queer temporalities.

·       The author ends this chapter and the book with a specific case history, the musical career of Ferron, through which to analyze the theme of generational conflict and queer time.

__________________________________________


Please Note: This is the summarized note of the first introductory chapter of the book  Queer Time and Place by Judith Halberstam. The author of this note does not hold any personal opinions on the works and authors mentioned . The author has not included any extra information. The intention of this note is  only to make the reading of the essay easy.

Philo- Lit

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Notes on Philip Auslander's "Postmodernism and Performance"

Notes on David Ayers' "New Criticism and Beyond"

Notes on “Modern European Drama: Origins and Patterns” by John Fletcher and James McFarlane